When evaluating performance, what should the criteria be based on?

The correct answer is based on the principle that performance evaluations must be fair, objective, and grounded in specific, clearly articulated standards. Clearly stated criteria provide a transparent framework that helps ensure all evaluators are measuring performance against the same benchmarks. This clarity helps to minimize subjective interpretations and ensures that expectations are understood by both evaluators and those being evaluated.

When performance is assessed using clearly defined criteria, it allows for consistency, accountability, and objective assessment of skills and behaviors within the context of the role or task being evaluated. It also helps to address issues of fairness and equity in evaluations, promoting an environment where individuals are assessed based on their merit and contributions, rather than personal biases or arbitrary standards.

On the other hand, basing evaluations on personal biases and preferences can lead to inconsistent and subjective judgments that undermine the integrity of the evaluation process. General notions of performance may be too vague to effectively gauge an individual's capabilities, while current popularity in the field may shift over time and does not necessarily reflect an individual’s actual performance or potential. Hence, utilizing clearly stated criteria is essential for effective and just performance evaluations.