Under what condition may social workers limit clients' self-determination?

Social workers are committed to supporting clients' self-determination as a fundamental principle of practice, fostering clients’ ability to make their own choices and define their own paths. However, this principle is not absolute and can be limited under certain conditions. The correct answer highlights a crucial aspect of ethical practice: when clients pose a serious and imminent risk to themselves or others, social workers have a responsibility to intervene and may need to limit self-determination to protect those at risk.

This intervention aligns with the ethical obligation to ensure safety and well-being. In situations where clients exhibit behaviors or intentions that suggest they may harm themselves or others, social workers must prioritize the health and safety of all individuals involved. This may involve taking necessary steps to protect the client or others, even if it means overriding the client's wishes.

In contrast, the other choices do not present valid reasons for limiting self-determination. When goals are perceived as unrealistic, it does not justify imposing limitations on a client's autonomy, as clients have the right to set their own objectives, regardless of feasibility. If clients specifically seek assistance, this indicates their desire to engage and collaborate, which supports, rather than limits, their self-determination. Lastly, if a client is unable to express their