If a colleague's impairment is known but no remedial action has been taken, what should a social worker do?

The choice to take action through established appropriate channels is the correct response because it aligns with the ethical responsibility of social workers to ensure the well-being of clients and the integrity of the profession. When a colleague's impairment is known, it signifies a potential risk not just to clients but also to the standards of practice within the field.

Taking action through appropriate channels is critical because it allows for a structured and professional way to address the issue, ensuring that it is handled with sensitivity to confidentiality, the rights of the colleague, and the need to protect clients. This may involve reporting the matter to a supervisor, a professional ethics board, or a regulatory body, depending on the situation. This approach ensures that the impairment is evaluated, and appropriate steps are taken to support both the colleague and the clients who may be affected.

This proactive response acknowledges the need for accountability and supports a culture of safety, ethics, and professionalism in social work. Engaging with established procedures helps to safeguard not only clients but also the welfare of the impaired colleague, providing them with opportunities for support and assistance.